A brand voice guide AI actually follows. I rebuilt mine from my own edits.

My AI drafts kept drifting from how I write. When I checked my voice guide against its own rules, it failed 6 times. Here's how I rebuilt it from my real edits, how it compares to AirOps and Profound brand kits, the 8 lessons that changed my writing, and a free template and prompts.

A brand voice guide AI follows has three things most guides skip: real examples of your writing, a reason for every rule, and a check that runs on every draft. Adjectives like "confident" and "friendly" don't make the cut. A model can't copy an adjective. It copies sentences.

I learned that by checking my own guide. My AI drafts kept drifting from how I write, so I ran my voice guide against its own rules. It failed 6 times.

The old voice guide checked against its own rules: 6 issues
My v1 guide, checked by the script I built for v2. The title had an em dash. My own example sentence used a pattern the guide bans.

Here's how I rebuilt it, what I learned doing it, and a free template with the same structure.

The last straw was one LinkedIn post that took four drafts to stop sounding like generic advice and start sounding like me.

Why does AI ignore your brand voice guide?

Three reasons, and my old guide had all three.

The rules were spread across files. My voice rules lived in six places: the guide, a config file, my notes vault, the checker, 13 correction lessons and two saved notes. There were three different banned-word lists, with 7, 12 and 28 entries. No single file had every rule, so each AI tool followed whichever one it read.

Six places my voice rules lived
Where my voice rules lived in October 2026.

The examples taught the wrong habit. My guide banned the "it's not X, it's Y" framing. Its own thesis example was "AI doesn't scale content; systems do." AI copies examples more faithfully than rules, so the example won.

The rules had no reasons. "No em dashes" kept failing in image captions and alt text, after the body text was clean. The rule only held once it said why: templates ship word for word, so one dash in a template repeats on every page.

How do you build a brand voice guide AI will follow?

Five steps. I did each one this week on my own guide.

1. Write who you're writing for

One paragraph: their role, their stage, what they already tried, how they read.

Who I write for, from section 1 of my guide
Who I write for, from section 1 of my guide

Mine is a Series A SaaS founder with no marketing team who has already tried a freelancer, an agency and ChatGPT. That one paragraph changes every draft. It turns "explain the concept" into "show the real example".

2. Name 4 or 5 traits, each with a real "sounds like" and "doesn't"

Pick traits you can show. For each one, paste a sentence you actually wrote and the generic version AI gives you.

Five traits with a sounds-like and doesn't example each
Five traits with a sounds-like and doesn't example each

3. Give every rule a reason

A rule with a reason covers the cases you didn't list. Write the rule, then "Why:", then an example.

Rule 8 with its reason
Rule 8 with its reason

4. Turn your edits into before and after examples

This is the part most guides skip, and it matters most. Every time you rewrite an AI draft, keep the old line and the new line. They show the model exactly what you want.

Real edits kept in section 7 of the guide
Real edits kept in section 7 of the guide

The edit I make all the time: deleting the last sentence of a paragraph. AI loves to explain the point it just made.

5. Put banned words in one list and check it with code

AI checkers miss words. In my own system, an AI checker once marked a draft "pass" while it contained "content engine", a phrase on its own banned list. A script doesn't skip anything.

I wrote a small one, voice_lint.py. It reads the banned list straight from the guide, so there's one list to update. It also catches em dashes, "it's not X, it's Y" framing, hedges like "might" and "perhaps", question hooks, and "SAAS" in all caps.

Approved posts pass the checker
Two posts I approved and published, checked by the same script: clean.

What should a brand voice guide include?

The standard best practice, from style guides like Mailchimp's, comes down to one idea: your voice stays the same everywhere, and your tone changes with the context. A good guide has personality traits with "sounds like" and "doesn't sound like" examples, words to use and avoid, a tone guide by channel, style decisions like contractions and commas, and real examples from your own writing.

The AI content platforms add the parts a model needs. AirOps' Brand Kit is built from Foundations (company description, mission, values, brand voice and tone, author persona, global writing rules), plus audiences, content types, product lines, regions and competitors. Its writing rules are scoped: global rules apply everywhere, and audience or region rules override them. Profound's Brand Kit splits into brand information (about the brand, ideal customer profile, competitors, brand point of view) and writing style (author persona, tone of voice, writing rules), generated from your website.

Here's how they compare, based on their public docs as of Nov 2026, and what I added to mine:

SectionStandard style guideAirOps Brand KitProfound Brand KitMy voice guide
Who you write forSometimesAudiencesIdeal customer profilePrimary reader and the champion who forwards it
Company foundations and point of viewRarelyDescription, mission, valuesAbout the brand, brand point of viewThe line word for word, what we believe
Author personaNoAuthor personaAuthor personaFirst person, background used only when relevant
Traits with examplesYesBrand voice and toneTone of voice5 traits, each with a real "sounds like" and "doesn't"
RulesDo's and don'tsWriting rules, scopedWriting rules21 rules, each with the reason and an example
Banned wordsWords to avoidInside writing rulesInside writing rulesOne list, checked by a script
Tone by channelYesContent typesNot in their docsTone table for 7 contexts, plus structures per format
Style sheetYesInside writing rulesInside writing rulesCommas, numbers, casing, product names
CompetitorsNoCompetitorsCompetitorsHow to name them fairly, with sources
Real edits, before and afterNoContent samplesWriting sampleEvery correction, dated
A check on every draftNoNot in their docsNot in their docsvoice_lint.py plus a review checklist
Proof it's used everywhereNoApplies inside the platformApplies inside the platformvoice_coverage.py across every tool

The platforms are good at storing a brand kit and applying it inside their own tools. A markdown file in your repo goes further: every tool you use can read it, and you can check that each one does.

What I learned rebuilding my voice guide

  1. One file wins. Three banned lists meant three voices. Everything else should point to one guide.
  2. Check the guide against itself. Mine broke its own rules 6 times before any AI touched it.
  3. Examples outrank rules. A bad example teaches the habit faster than a rule forbids it.
  4. Reasons make rules stick. The em dash rule only held once it explained why.
  5. Your edits are your voice. The before and after pairs taught more than any trait description.
  6. Code checks words, AI checks judgment. Banned words go to a script. "Is the hook specific?" goes to a person or a reviewer.
  7. Rules go stale. An older rule said never open a LinkedIn post with "I". A newer structure said open with what I did. The fix: date every rule, and the newer one wins.
  8. Write for one reader. The "who I write for" paragraph improved drafts more than any single rule.

Where does your brand voice show up?

Everywhere a buyer, a client or an AI engine reads your words. That's more places than most guides plan for:

OutputWhat the guide controls
LinkedIn postsThe first line, the structure, the ending
Blog posts and tutorialsThe opening answer, the headings, the proof
Video scriptsOne takeaway per section, numbers said out loud
NewsletterOne topic, one link, the sign-off
Outbound and client messagesThe first line about them, the tone, how you name competitors
Page titles, meta descriptions, alt text, image cardsPunctuation, casing, banned words
Profiles and llms.txtThe company line, word for word

The last two rows are where voice leaks. Templates and image cards ship word for word, and AI answer engines quote your profiles and page descriptions when they describe you.

How do you get AI to use it every time?

Put one line where every tool reads first. In a code repo that's CLAUDE.md (Claude Code) and AGENTS.md (Codex):

Read config/voice-guide.md first before writing anything in our voice. It wins over every other style note.

In ChatGPT or Claude, make a Project, upload the guide, and put the same line in the project instructions. Then call it by section, so the model knows which part to use:

How do you know it's included everywhere?

Check it like code. I wrote a second script, voice_coverage.py. It confirms that every instruction file and every writing tool points to the guide, and that every other banned list in my system is contained in the guide's list.

The coverage check: 15 covered, 0 gaps
The first run found 7 gaps: my main instructions never told agents to read the guide, and two outreach tools never loaded it. After the fixes: 15 covered, 0 gaps.

Run it after you add any new tool, skill or project. A voice guide that one tool skips is a voice guide that tool ignores.

Get the template

Download the voice guide template. It's the same structure as my real guide, with brackets to fill in, plus a map of which sections go into AirOps and Profound fields. Save it as voice-guide.md wherever your AI tools read first.

Download the prompts: one to build your guide from your writing and your edits, one to write in your voice, one to check a draft, and one to turn an edit into a new rule. Here's the first one:

You are helping me write a brand voice guide that AI tools will follow. Use the template I'm attaching.
I'm giving you: A) 10 pieces of my writing I'm proud of, B) 5 drafts next to the version I published,
C) who I write for. In order, asking me before each step:
1. From A, find 4 or 5 traits. Quote one real sentence of mine for each, plus the generic AI version.
2. From B, turn every change I made into a rule: the rule, why, and the before and after.
3. Put the words I removed or never use in one banned list.
4. Draft the full guide from the template. Mark anything you guessed with [CHECK].
Quote me exactly and don't add hype.

How SuperMarketers builds this for clients

In month one, I interview your founder and experts, collect your best existing work, and build the voice guide from it, along with the checks every draft passes before you see it. It's the base every other piece of work runs on, and it stays in your tools.

FAQ

How long should a brand voice guide be?

Long enough to hold real examples. Mine is about 390 lines. Length matters less than whether every rule has a reason and an example.

Can I just paste my old posts into ChatGPT or Claude?

It helps, but samples alone don't tell the model what to avoid or why. The edits and the reasons do that.

How often should I update it?

Every time you correct a draft. Add the rule the same day, with the date.

What's the difference between brand voice and tone?

Voice stays the same everywhere. Tone shifts by format: a LinkedIn post is shorter and punchier than a tutorial. The guide holds both: traits for voice, structures by format for tone.

Start with your last five edits. They already know your voice. If you'd rather have it built from your team's best work, book a call.

◆ ◆ ◆
Want this built for your team?

Your voice, written down.
and checked on every draft.

In month one we interview your founder and experts, build your voice guide from your best work, and set up the checks every draft passes before you see it. From $5,000 a month.

Book a 30-minute call →